• qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Give it back. It will be fine. And since we’re asking, make Stumble Upon return from the dead.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some things about the Internet back then really sucked. However, pre-SEO and AI bullshit Internet search was significantly superior to what we have now.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember Google coming out and changing everything.

    It had billions of pages instead of millions.

    It returned results in seconds, and by seconds I mean 2-3, not 60.

    Everything else became irrelevant overnight.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        it’s not just google

        for the past year or so I’ve been telling people that DDG is so much better as it actually returns the results you’re looking for, which Google stopped doing. except in the past few months, the same thing is happening there now too.

        I don’t know if it’s fuckery with the search engines, people gaming SEO, ads, or if it’s just the sheer quantity of shit that’s on the internet now, but it’s at least half of the time now that I go to search something and it’s not in the top half dozen results. and sometimes I can’t even find it at all, despite knowing that it definitely exists out there.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          DDG has been shit for longer than a few months.

          StartPage still gives me decent results, and my understanding is that it uses google somehow in the backend, so the capability is still there.

          It’s (Google) just been polluted by all of the AI and personalized ad bullshit

        • ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s the web in general. Pages that have been meticulously altered to score high on the latest search engines so they get the most visibility. I remember several times where the top results were obviously LLM generated text scraped from multiple other pages. Tons and tons of text with absolutely zero substance on the topic I was trying to learn about.

          I switched to using Startpage as my search engine now. It works great. It feels like being transported back in time. It gets the results I want. Less websites full of AI generated fluff articles.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          DDG been shit for years. I went for it when their campaign was about not being in q bubble and getting unfiltered results. For yesrs everything that came back was hyper local. Search a name you get a doctor or history or spelling correction of someone in my town of 30,000 people or their ancestor. Turn off location puts something generic in top place and then everything else after as normal.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is, but in fairness all the sites doing SEO broke it just as much as their infinite chase for advertiser money.

        And now AI is here to break it even further.

    • Miller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yahoo for a while was becoming the world wide web, messenger, clubs, search, email and games all engaged with on a single identity, even turned down an offer to buy Google. Then it packed it all away and went home.

        • noahm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yahoo Japan is actually a completely separate company.

          Yahoo itself is still extremely popular in the US, just with a different demographic than we (the sort of people on the fediverse) regularly interact with. Their sports, finance, and news sites are some of the most popular on the internet. I don’t think it’s particularly relevant in the web search space these days though, and hasn’t been for a long time.

          I think we don’t hear much about it because it has found a niche and is staying within it. It’s profitable, but not on an “infinite growth forever” trajectory so it rarely makes the news. Honestly kind of respectable.

          • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yahoo itself is still extremely popular in the US, just with a different demographic…

            My Nan was a faithful Yahoo user from her first WebTV right up to her death. I imagine she’d be exchanging all caps emails still if we’d buried her with a laptop.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      I was a dmoz editor for a bit. They created the directory that Yahoo used on their site. Kind of wish directories came back.

    • Hasherm0n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      A few years ago while cleaning out my late grandmother’s house, I found a physical book which was just a listing and description of various websites.

  • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I remember when we were all trying to “learn the internet” still and Ask Jeeves was the search engine my school chose and we literally learned in class how to use search engines. I remember the decision of which search engine to use being very murky and changing a few times before they settled on Ask Jeeves

    • Dejected Warp Core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      On a related note: every search engine under the sun now has AI built in EXCEPT the one called “Ask Jeeves”. If any of them should have been 100% AI, it was this one. And instead, it fucking died in the middle of all this.

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    AltaVista’s advanced search (e.g. the NEAR statement) was extremely effective. Google was never as good even in its best days, nevermind now.

    • noahm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s overstating it. There’s a reason Google took over: it was better pretty much all around. The original Google algorithm was a really amazing tool for finding quality content on the web as it existed in those days. That was before SEO drove all these focused efforts on gaming the system.

      With that said, Alta Vista definitely was the most promising tool before Google, and it had some potential if it hadn’t been so poorly managed by DEC. They simply saw it as a cool demo for their Alpha server platform, and never had any vision for it as a meaningful product on its own.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Sure, but it was the best tool for science/technology searches, in the hand of an expert user. I’m still salty all subsequent search engines were inferior in that respect.

  • Basically, it was as shit then as Google is currently. Actually, it was still slightly better; at least they acknowledged operator signs in the search (+, -, putting phrases in quotes, etc). Google doesn’t even do that anymore.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    Cool article. I remember the good and the bad. When it comes to search, it has gotten worse over time. I’d love to use some early 2000s Google again. It wasn’t perfect, but the bones were there.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ask jeeves was better at one point. It was an actual toss up which search engine was going to go well early 2000s.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yep, Jeeves was really popular for a while. I was an Alta Vista fan for a while too. It was one of my favorite early searches.

        What I really miss about early web searching is the cached pages where you could see all your highlighted search terms exactly where they appear on the page. Modern google dumps you at the front door to the corporate walled garden and you usually have to search again with some shitty embedded search tool. Old Google would link you to a .htm or .html page with the exact answer.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Any information was available but its veracity was always questioned. And this was before Wikipedia too so the only reliable sources were Encarta and Britannica unless you had a very cutting edge library.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah if you back too far it sucked. If you go to far toward the present it sucks too. Bell curve of performance which is not what I would have expected, but it’s what we got. Paid optimization has really fucked it.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      The peak was during the period you could say “If you search on Google for ___ you get ___.” Back when it was predictable. When they started personalizing results was the moment they sliced society’s brake lines.

      I remember…I had a Windows 8.1 machine, I needed to SSH into a Raspberry Pi. No Powershell, no native SSH client, the easiest way to get one was to install PuTTY. So I googled “putty”. All lowercase, search engines sometimes get fucky when you start doing caps and punctuation, etc. I got an entire page of results for and about the TTY client, and nothing about drywall spackle or non-newtonian children’s toys. Because I often search for stuff like that, it made a bet and went all in.

      The horrifying part of that is, that innocuous example makes it sound great. I didn’t have to overcome the “why did you name it that?” problem and refine the search by adding “tty client” or something like that. By getting to know me it took me to exactly what I wanted to find. When trying to find utility software, that’s okay. That’s not all people search the web for.

      Now it’s hooked up to the “You’re right to call me out on that” machine, we’re sliding down the mountainside upside down on fire.

  • GutterRat42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I had a list of websites to visit that I kept on a notebook because the only internet I had available was at a cybercafé