• kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    You know what? I’m OK with a panopticon specifically for convicted stalkers. I realize the potential for a slippery slope, but I think the risk is worth it in this one case.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The article says suspects, not convicts.

      And all this means is they’ll be limited to online stalking.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      then you’ll realize the even bigger slippery slope when you reread the article and discover it is for suspected stalkers