About a week or two ago, I started noticing that I could no longer copy the clean links for search result hits on Google. I thought it was maybe some quirk of a browser I was using, but today when trying to copy a link to a Youtube video, I realized it was actually rolled out globally (it seems).

Basically instead of getting a
https://youtube/. com/watch?v=-ed6UeDp1ek link now through google, (spaced out link to avoid AutoMod) you will get
https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAES<rest-of-encrypted-blob-containing--versionByte-keyID-cipherText>

The article describes the change in technical detail, and mentions a fix, but the author has kept it private for now so Google doesn’t patch it up (like they probably will or have for this workaround relying on the “Translate Page” feature with a different Browser Language selection [Twitter Link, Aug 27]).

Why it will probably be patched:

Surprised there’s no post about it here already.
Only Hackernews article I could find (4 days ago):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506338

Edit: It seems to matter a lot whether your network is deemed “spammy” or problematic by Google for the encrypted URLs to kick in, even if you’re logged out. Funnily enough my google searches went back to normal a few hours after I posted this. So a logged out session might get the regular, unencrypted links if your IP network has a good rating on Google’s end. Mine often runs into captchas and the like, so it makes sense why I’d be targeted by this new change.
Then again, I just tested on my mobile cellular on a logged out search, and I still have the goto’s. Can’t really control that.

  • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    an underrated feature in duckduckgo is easily toggling between international search results and local (my country) search results. both are things I want often, but I much more rarely want to select any other country, so it makes sense for the toggle to work the way it does. also noai duckduckgo is a blessing.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So google has no problems unleashing their bots on others but they don’t want to get scraped themselves?

    That’s the sort of shit that should get your company disbanded in any functioning civilization.

        • Randelung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          And it’ll even sometimes show relevant results!

          Seriously though, noai.ddg is my default, but I still have to switch to google way too often.

          • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            i haven’t had to switch to google in years. when I can’t find something it’s usually because I am looking for something from over a decade ago that nothing can find. I guess you have to search differently with alternative search engines, and I still have that proficiency.

  • axx@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Log in and your results are still clean links, so this has spread through scraper people and nobody else.

    Nobody else? Screw you, corporate fanboy.

  • stevles@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Duck is as good as Google was before they got gimped by laws and insane levels of advertising. Have been using it religiously for months, no issues.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Kagi user for over two years now, can recommend if you’re not against paying for quality search.

      • MadBits@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Kagi is really good. I use Qwant because its free and somewhat close, but Kagi was really really good.

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’m against paying for search because I don’t want my search history to be directly tied to my real name via my payment method. I don’t care what their privacy policy says.

      • Marthirial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The future of search engines is in the settings. Allowing you to control how you search is the only weapon against the direction Google imagine we all should find stuff online.

        Kagi is the only search engine who has embraced this and they get my money for it.

      • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Startpage is another alternative if you use more than the free searches Kagi gives you. I usually reserve my Kagi searches for when other engines like Startpage, Qwant, DDG, etc. have failed me.

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’ve been using duck for at least 3 years, probably closer to 6 or 7. When I first used it, its searches were okay, but if I couldn’t find what I was looking for a quick trip to Google would fix that. I felt like it improved slightly over some time, but also Google got a lot worse. Now with the AI proliferation, I never bother going to Google, and duck is still better than it was a year or two ago. Their AI has about a 20 or 30% success rate for me, but I just use it as a top search if I use it at all. I would love it if the results didn’t change when I run the same search 2 minutes apart, though.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        A few days ago when I was converting an old windows desktop to Linux I hit Google on accident (Firefox default).

        On the first page I got 2 traditional search results. They were links to AI slop sites. The entire rest of the page was full of useless crap.

    • refreeze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Maybe its just me, but I find I get way more useless seo blog spam results using DuckDuckGo.

      • vestigeofgreen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        20 hours ago

        DDG uses Bing’s index. I assume Bing doesn’t nerf AI in rankings as I get so many slop AI SEO sites that I don’t get on an equivalent Google search. I used DDG itself before like 2024, but now I reflexively add !g if I don’t think !w will work.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Ddg used to give non bubble results, it was their thing. Now its sucks and is location based even when disabled. DDG went to the dogs years ago.

          Qwant

        • Pistachio@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Forgive the ignorance, but what is !g and !w? And is it added at the end of the search or…?

          • MaskedNybbles@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            DuckDuckGo has the concept of predefined bangs, in which a search prepended by a bang—a !, followed by one or more letters or characters and a space—redirects a search to another site. Some other sites have adopted the concept. More information can be found at https://duckduckgo.com/bangs.

            [EDIT] !g and !w will take you to Google and Wikipedia, respectively.

      • soratoyuki@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Same. I’ve been using DDG as my default for years, but it’s main strength for me is using !g to redo the search after not finding anything good the first time.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Ddg always does a “word1 OR word2 OR word3” search for me, which is useless half of the time and always annoying. Did i set a wrong option or something?

      • kazerniel@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        yeah, this is what usually makes me redo the search with google (and/or liberally use double quotes)

    • Danitos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Just a heads up, Ecosia relies on you clicking on Microsoft and Google provided ads for its revenue.

      From there FAQ:

      Do we plant trees if we don’t click on ads?

      Like other search engines, we make money when people click on the ads shown in our search results. […]

      How does Ecosia compare to other search engines?

      […] We provide industry standard search results together with our partners Google and Bing. […]

    • kazerniel@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I used Ecosia for a few months last year, but it really struggled with more niche topics and searches in Hungarian. Also it kept re-enabling the AI search every other day, no matter how many times I disabled it. So in the end I switched to noai.duckduckgo.

    • onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I just tried Ecosia again after a long while (I last tried it around sometime in early 2020/21) and it seems a lot nicer and better than before. I’ll use it for a little bit then :$

    • alakey@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Stopped using them after being pestered by cloudflare garbage every 2nd visit despite having cookies enabled for it.

  • cx40@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I got this too a few weeks ago and couldn’t find any information on how to convert the address back to normal. I guess it makes sense if most people don’t get those results. My fix was to just use a different search engine.

    fyi, I got it while I was logged in.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If you are in android, try the URLCheck from the F-droid store.not sure if works with this, but it work with SoundCloud that do something close

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You’ve probably not seen it. It only happens when you’re logged out.

    Heh, I haven’t seen it because I don’t use google.

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Glad we have stuff like Startpage and Kagi, which are both better than Google anyways. There’s also Qwant, but it’s not as good as Kagi or Startpage.

    • punkfungus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I just tried a test search with Qwant and Startpage. On mobile they returned the exact same results (which were good), which suggests that Startpage is using Qwant there. On desktop though, Startpage was hot garbage. Not a single relevant result on page one, with nearly half being links to Facebook and Instagram. Hard pass on that.

      I tested this on mobile too. Opened a Firefox private browsing window, switched to desktop mode and tried the search term on Startpage again. Same trash results as desktop. It’s like they’re actively telling desktop users to piss off.

    • onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I wasn’t aware of Qwant. It seems to build its own index instead of relying on other providers (great), and has proper backing to be a viable competitor in something so big (the French government seems to endorse it; along with institutional use in EU parliament?).
      I just tested it and unfortunately got a 403 however (FORBIDDEN). Though I was behind an endpoint of a very popular VPN for some testing, that sucks regardless.

      Actually, before I could post this, I tried the search refresh and it worked somehow.
      To test again I switched to another server of the same VPN provider (same selected country) and tried searching. Same error, which didn’t go away after doing the refresh. So they might have some sort of spam prevention measure which eases itself automatically, but I feel like it could definitely be implemented better if that’s the case.

      Edit: Yep, if you sit on that 403 page for 5-6 minutes without doing anything and then hit the relaunch your search button, things work as intended afterwards.

      • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        turn off your adblocker

        edit: lmao why so many downvotes? this is what qwant does when you use an adblocker

        • onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I tried without uBlock Origin on my end and it did indeed work. I incorrectly assumed it was my vpn without properly verifying. Though CactusEcho said there were problems without the adblocker so it may be inconclusive.

          • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            if you have a good adblocker, you can turn it off for sites that have responsible policies with privacy and advertising and are barely scraping by as it is.

            if you can’t turn your adblocker for specific sites, get a better one. ublock origin is great.

            in case you can’t stand ads and need an ethical search engine get something like kagi. you have to pay for it but these websites can’t operate for free. don’t leech off companies that are struggling.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I am not sure how they “clean” it. If you put in a youtube link or amazon, they can easily clean it because they just need to remove everything after the ?

      E.g, https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ becomes https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ

      However, by google doing this, you’re forced to check the link to see what the redirection even is. By the time you click to share that, you’re already tracked.

    • deleted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I like it so much, and it’s my go-to search tool. Sometimes it struggles to identify official websites, but that only happens in about 1 out of every 100 searches.

      I wish it had image search though.