I’m sure you could argue that Unit 731 had value and another one could create more, but it’s your job to prove it without providing further evidence of misanthropy.
That’s an odd position to take, considering (according to your own words anyway) data centers are just a technology, and it’s the use that matters. And we all know where those local models really come from.
It’s odd to oppose the concentration of access to hardware, and the resulting corporation-owned monopoly? You think data centers are “just a technology?” Where do local models “really come from” and why do you think it matters?
Sprawling, unnecessary, wasteful buildings containing technologies seized from the public so that corporations can establish a monopoly on technology that should be freely available for everyone.
I’m sure you could argue that Unit 731 had value and another one could create more, but it’s your job to prove it without providing further evidence of misanthropy.
Why is that my job? I oppose data centers, I’ll state that plainly since you can’t seem to reason.
That’s an odd position to take, considering (according to your own words anyway) data centers are just a technology, and it’s the use that matters. And we all know where those local models really come from.
It’s odd to oppose the concentration of access to hardware, and the resulting corporation-owned monopoly? You think data centers are “just a technology?” Where do local models “really come from” and why do you think it matters?
This should be entertaining…
If data centers aren’t technology, what are they? Nature?
Sprawling, unnecessary, wasteful buildings containing technologies seized from the public so that corporations can establish a monopoly on technology that should be freely available for everyone.