You’re suppose to read 6 first, but otherwise 7 and 9 first. This hurts my head.
In each case it’s smaller number first.
Well when you say it that way
deleted by creator
That’s my next wedding outfit sorted
I’ve realized you probably meant your next outfit as a guest, but at first I pictured someone who was on spouse number four already planning wedding number five with this outfit in mind and I really enjoyed how evocative that image was.
they said what they said
6-7
6-9
11-7
11-9Or
7-6
9-6
7-11
9-11This needs to be cross-posted into mildly infuriating.
I’d give them M-D or D-M but not both.
Somehow I was expecting 7 of 9 at some point
6 is row major
11 is column majorThis shirt doesn’t go hard, and whoever designed it had to eat the 67 chiccy nuggies for the rest of his life
There’s no other way to do it. Both items in each set need to be perpendicular to the other set.
That shirt makes me feel dirty. And not in a good way.
It’s washable.
Out damned spot!
Tertiary adjunct of unimatrix yum.
I was expecting Bill and Ted for top right…
who is top right
No, Who is on first.
No, 9 is still there…
it is 8 and 10 that are missing.
7 8 8 & 10
I cannot argue with this logic 🤣
Also don’t forget about [redacted] - that’s very important!
