cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/scientificarticles/p/1459618/fear-responsibility-and-shame-in-young-mens-sexual-lives-new-study-suggests-that-many-yo
This study examines how this generation of young heterosexual men—who have come of age in the “age of consent”—emotionally experience sex. We thematically analyzed 31 in-depth interviews with men aged 18 to 32 years. The most striking finding is how rarely these men described enjoying sex. Three themes emerged. First, anxiety and vigilance accompanied sexual encounters. Second, there was a moral concern about causing harm to a sexual partner. Third, shame arose not only from accusations by others, but also from self-criticism. The themes overlap substantially, suggesting aspects of a complex, sometimes contradictory experience. The defining feature is an inward turn: a cultural suspicion of men appears to have been internalized by some young men. For these men, the question when navigating consent is often not only “does she want this?” but “am I the kind of man who could get this wrong?” Sex, as one participant put it, is “like you’re trying to defuse a bomb.” These young men have come to approach sex as a hazard to manage rather than a relational experience to share. They attributed this wariness to the cultural climate that surrounds consent.

A group of 31 men seems way too small to make statements like this, no?
Not necessarily. The minimum is usually set at 30. More is also more accurate though. What’s more important is how random the group is selected.
Are they really making much of a statement? Just “many young men see sex as a hazard to manage”.
I appreciate a comment pointing out sample size for the many people who don’t actually read the article. I see tons of “scientific” articles posted on Lemmy that make much broader and definitive statements with tiny sample sizes. It’s hard to conclude much more beyond “more study needed”. But in this case I think the paper has some interesting quotes for discussion.
The title is IMO and for most people, that’s enough.