No. Xep is in a different timezone than me and doesn’t have as good English. All my accounts are named psud or pseudopsud. I have three accounts as I have had bad luck with instances.
I try not to post or comment under my other logins - when Aussie.zone is down I just read, otherwise I’d get replies I wouldn’t see for months
Wine being healthy was from epidemiology - the sort of study that sends out tens of thousands of food frequency questionnaires asking people to detail what categories of food each participant ate over the prior 5 years.
All it really said is the kind of person who says they have 1 glass of wine each day is healthier than the kind of person who says they have none
An earlier similar study was done that said people who claimed to consume eggs had worse heart health. This one was tested later by a controlled trial where people were told to eat or not eat eggs. That study found eggs were protective against heart disease.
Outing me for my diet? Right after I say what my diet is?
You won’t have enough energy. We need either fat or carbohydrates for energy
Laughs in no fibre for years
Also you can eat none and be perfectly healthy
That’s what happens when you eat too much sugar
Ah, your story was trying to build up to “fibre is vital” the only studies of fibre on constipation and straining on the toilet showed fibre increased both, reducing fibre improved both, eliminating fibre completely fixed both
The comparison that one made was “adding fibre to improve constipation is like adding cars to improve traffic”
N=2 now
That’s pretty funny, I know it’s not true though as a no fibre diet for that long has to be very high fat and I’ve read a lot about low fibre high fat diets that I know that make shitting easy
I mean a paper that is not an epidemiological one (as they have no ability to show cause and effect) that shows you die without fibre after however long without it
Like life without vitamin C or its precursor goes on for a couple of months then symptoms get serious and you die of scurvy
What’s the time limit on fibre?
Can you point to research that says we require fibre?
I don’t tolerate sugar or fibre well, and I’ll avoid plant oils in general
They conclude the cancers are triggered by the fats not ketones based on the study title (I haven’t had time to read the study yet)
So these mice were on a high carb diet with exogenous ketones? 6% energy from fat isn’t ketogenic
Ok so I’m not a mouse, I’m not from a line deliberately bred for cancer, and my diet has none of those things; my 80% energy from fat is from beef fat. I think I’m not going to worry about this
What were the mice fed? Is this like a vegetarian low carb diet where the fats come from factory fats - seed oils?
Does “susceptible mice” mean mice that are highly prone to cancer?
Were they also fed carcinogens?
There is reason to think that high meat, high animal fat diets are protective against cancer, as cancer depends on sugar
That’ll make you fat and bring on metabolic syndrome and all that
It’s closer to gender and health wrecker do it’s probably in line with Trump policy, except that it reduces fertility