FiniteBanjo

You can make it happen faster in a furnace but it will happen regardless.

More like tossing FAFO

badum’tsh

Walls aren’t up yet, just an empty foundation and some steel beams.

Well, now you’re contradicting yourself from earlier when you stated we were discussing Calcium Carbonate and Silicate.

The Calcium Carbonate degrades into Calcium Oxide. Calcium Oxide will form Calcium Hydroxide on the cured surface.

The only reliable way to seperate the Calcium from the oxidation afaik would be the introduction of Chlorine, so you’re definitely not seeing the reverse happening regardless of how much carbon dioxide there is.

Only if it is uncoated iron rebar. There are also coated rebar, galvanized rebar, stainless steel rebar, or fiberglass rebar.

Iron is the most popular rebar among workers for its ability to be shaped by hand and easily cut, but it’s lacking in longevity due to its chemical vulnerability.

Galvanized is also weak to chemical attacks but from Alkaline attacks.

Carbonation causes acidity and the traditional methods of creating concrete involves furnaces which introduce various forms of carbonation. The Calcium Carbonate once dissolved in water will start to form the Calcium Hydroxide layer on the surface, thats the alkaline layer, and deeper in the carbonation creates acidity.

In outpatient care it’s not nearly as skewed from my experience, but at least you bring anecdotal evidence rather than nothing at all so thanks for contributing to the discussion.

I am a bit jadef against the previous commenter because he is a known slopper promoting these shitbots.

The concrete is actually highly acidic but the outer layer cures to become alkaline and the two layers together end up becoming water resistant, so by adding acid to the surface it can lose its water repellent capability and weaken faster.

If the concrete were sealed with a wax or an acrylic then Acetone would also be effective.

Not basically, that’s exactly what it is.

Fun Fact, United Healthcare has been rolling out automated claim handleing and denial for a couple of years now, leading to increased denial rates, even after their CEO was murdered.

Thats such a stupid claim that others become more stupid just from reading it

It doesn’t do any of those things comparably to a trained human being.

It is also a massive liability for privacy and HIPPA laws, among other more immediate harm it can cause by misdiagnosis or misinformation.

I want clinics who rolled this out to be prosecuted for negligence resulting in bodily harm.

They threw balloons over the fence to weaken concrete with Salt, Acetic Acid, Peroxide, and acrylic paint at some bare concrete and steel where a facility is going to be built.

I feel like the guy with the paint didn’t understand the memo.

And yet power usage in places like Virginia are soaring far past your claim of a mere fraction of a percent according to EIA, in addition to the fact that nearly all of these facilities have their own gas burner generators built in, and it’s expected to keep doubling power usage as more and more datacenters go online.

Why do you keep trying to justify throwing gas on the fire because the fire was already there? It doesn’t matter how clean or dirty the power used by humans was before, you will never be able to justify using even more power on worthless bullshit.

None of that has anything to do with AI consuming upwards of 30% of all power in some US States. None of that has anything to do with AI in 2025 being run on 35% renewable electricity and 50% or more fossil fuels which could have been used by citizens and consumers at lower prices instead.

Even if Elon Musk weren’t running illegal Natural Gas generators in Texas to power Grok, even if AI suddenly became 100% solar powered today in some fantasy fiction, it is still producing nothing of value but creating serious risks and we should still shut it down.

Let me try to creat a visual for you:

[///////]
Human-Use Power

[//////////] = [///////] + [///]
All power generated = Human-Use + AI

And in 4 years:

[/////////////] = [///////] + [//////]

You see that? You see how its using more? We’re already facing cataclysmic changes in weather patterns risking countless habitats including human ones, and we’re going to practically double power consumption so Trump can make a short video of his jet shitting on protestors.

If you have a plan to do that then that’s great but this isn’t a situation where anybody is willing to make trades of one or the other.

AI doesn’t have a single profitable use case given it generates plagiarism, hallucinations, and liabilities, so there’s no reason to keep it.

We’re burning the earth with our power consumption and polluting every online database or repository with hallucinations all for pictures of political figures doing ballet, and it is eventually going to cause a catastrophe, so yes, sooner would be better.

Well that sounds pretty horrible and I would to avoid it…

But if thats all it costs, then…