• lokalhorst@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s not only about the pigs. Of course there is an ethical aspect, but the ecological harm in terms of water/nutrient usage and CO2 emission are in the focus here. Your comparison is not helpful at all.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      The pigs are sufficient all on their own. Or do you only help vulnerable individuals when there is something in it for you personally?

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Most meat-eaters are content for animals to be raided and killed in order to eat them, so focusing on ecology doesn’t require you to convince someone that animals have a moral value similar to that of human beings, which is a tall order.

      • lokalhorst@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        I haven’t weighed up the ethical against the ecological impact at all, I have just said what the focus of the comment was you have answered to.

        If you are interested in my personal opinion - I am a vegetarian for 14 years now, because I cannot accept how we treat animals as a society in the context of factory farming, but also because of the ecological impact. I think eating meat consumes way too much resources.

        From a philosophical point of view I don’t think however that killing a pig is morally wrong, I just think the way we are doing it is wrong.

        If you like we can start a dialogue on this topic! But let’s exchange opinions and arguments and avoid being patronizing.