• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nothing I said related to capitalism at all as far as I can see, so you’re going to have to connect the dots for me if you want me to understand, sorry.

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          but it’s not going to decrease. it’s just not going to be spent on unnecessary stuff like toiling for corporate profits

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            So productivity as measured today is only going to decrease by the amount corresponding to corporate profits? How do you figure? What is that amount - do you have an estimate?

            As the other reply points out, profits are probably not what you care about anyway, because profits often just become the savings of ordinary people. So you want the proportion of profits that go to the already wealthy, plus the salaries of the mega wealthy.

            But regardless, that figure is some finite number and you’re saying it’s more than the productivity we’re going to lose due to an ageing population: how do you know? Actual estimates for how much we could free up by getting rid of profits and CEOs are highly uncertain and often negative.

          • boonhet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Corporate profits ARE old people’s retirement. Over 55s own 52% of the entire US economy. Boomers own 8 times more than billionaires. It’s similar in all western countries though perhaps not all are as bad. Billionaires are leeches but old people in general are the bigger drain on an aging society.