TL;DR this is a huge overhaul of the popular open-source audio editing app. The UI specifically has been the biggest overhaul, making it a lot more modern and friendly to use.

Hopefully, one day, GIMP will get some kind of update like this.

  • wylinka@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Any chance for an official flatpak? The current one on Flathub is outdated and requires lots of permissions because they couldn’t figure out xdg portals.

  • orenj [he/they]@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Didnt audacity shit the bed in some spectacular fashion a while back? I could’ve sworn there was some reason i moved to tenacity and it wasnt just a foss boner

    • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      in april 2021, they were purchased by MuseScore;

      a few weeks later, they announced that they would introduce Google Analytics and Yandex-based “telemetry”. After strong criticism by the community, Muse Group backtracked, emphasized their commitment to the GPL license, dropped their plans to include Google/Yandex tracking, and instead opted for a self-hosted solution for bug reports and update checks. Both can be disabled, and some distributions disable them by default.

      that one was a nothingburger imo as it was always opt-in, was never merged, and planned to only be in testing builds

      in july they proposed and then backtracked on a baffling new privacy policy and said they had really overzealous lawyers that they somehow mistrusted lawyers doing so “out of an abundance of caution”, which resolves the issue in my books—within two weeks, which is why i’m not absolving them, but it’s been five years since 2021 and absolutely no nonsense has happened.

      in fact, audacity has since gained a ton of productivity improvements, outlined in the video https://youtu.be/QYM3TWf_G38 that does have a conflict of interest

      tl;dr: i still support audacity

      receipts: https://github.com/audacity/audacity/discussions/889 , https://github.com/audacity/audacity/discussions/1353, and everything these link

    • BilSabab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      wasn’t it during the previous regime and one of the causes of the takeover? Because I haven’t heard of Audacity for quite a while

      • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Is a hard-fork that happened after the Audacity’s corporate, astroturf, and anti-user shift.

        This is a direct quote of their Codeberg repo:

        Motivation

        Our project initially started as a fork of Audacity as a result of multiple controversies and public relation crises, which you can find out more about here:

        Nevertheless, the goal of this project is to pick up the decades-long work by the original developers of Audacity and create an audio editor that is fresh, more modern, convenient and practical to use, with the help and the guidance of our users and our community.

        Differences from Audacity

        Tenacity is not merely an Audacity fork that removes error reporting and update checking, although it might seem like it. We have been hard at work implementing our own features and fixes and want to take Tenacity in a direction our users and community like. So far, we have fulfilled part of this endless goal by implementing the following:

        • New, modern themes.
        • Improved support for more platforms such as Haiku.
        • Matroska importing and exporting without needing FFmpeg.
        • Support for importing, editing, exporting Matroska chapters as label tracks.
        • Sync-lock improvements, including the ability to temporarily override sync-lock.
        • Horizontal scrolling in the Frequency Analysis window.
        • Under-the-hood changes, such as a revamped build system allowing for modern upstream dependencies.

        More changes are yet to come, big or small. We are always welcoming contributions to Tenacity, no matter how big or small, feature or fix. For more info, see the Contributing section.

  • reka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    As one of the most iconic consumer software FOSS projects this is enormous. Huge congrats to the team who picked this up in the last couple of years.

      • Mwa@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        i think they should have removed the line on top of the logo and it would look better.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          That’s what makes it look like headphones.

          Or is supposed to. It doesn’t really look like headphones any more. It’s one part knobs, one part volume label (the top shape), and one part pacman screaming at a giant pill.

          • Mwa@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            my proposal would make it look like a person listening to a speaker
            it currently looks like my proposal but with a line above a person and the speaker

    • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I complained to the maintainer about this a year ago. Ofc, they are free to ignore my complaints but ppl not liking the logo redesign is not news to them

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I outright hate it. For all of Tantacrul’s plugging on about design, he really dropped the ball, split his pants bending over for it.

      Yeah the older logo may have looked dated, but I think what I would have done is get rid of the yellow glow behind the waveform and flattened a blue headset with a red wave between, not whatever liberal arts major bullshit this is.

    • ddplf@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      What, you don’t like minimaalist slop that’s being shoved up into your ass left and right as part of our post-modernist lackluster culture that’s totally not been invented by the fascism?

        • ddplf@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          It absolutely it, it’s a modernist essence that has never been properly ejected from postmodernism, and as a result, taken it over. Minimalism as a term never under modernism, because there was no need for it, it was just the regularity of it.

          Mininalism is a rotten leaf that remains of the fascist aesthetics that is modernism.

          • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            it’s a modernist essence that has never been properly ejected from postmodernism

            That’s like saying that the essence of windows wasn’t ejected from a house.

            As for your other claims, you should look into the concept of touching grass, it’s pretty cool. Clears the head wonderfully.

    • lundah@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I do. It looks neat. Note that I am a hobbyist web dev and I automatically like all shiny web stuff :)

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I automatically assume their ‘ui update’ is bad based on their website alone.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t like it on desktop but goddamn, it sucks even more on mobile. I was swiping to scroll through the stupid horizontal menu and then when I got to the bottom of it, turns out I was scrolling so fast I basically teleported to the bottom of the page.

    • DrCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hate it on desktop, especially with a mouse. On mobile/trackpad it can be ‘ok’, I thought this worked well enough (not laggy or buggy) for me on mobile. But yeah, I do wish this “design” would end, just let me scroll at my own paste god damn it

  • redshift@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ll stick with 3.x, since they started using AI in 4.0 - or use Tenacity, of course.

  • Lexam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is audacity still bad and sending information to Russian servers or something?

      • Sparrow_1029@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Dang, clicked into the ToU changes in this MR:

        Merge pull request ‘Proposal Assembly 2026: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions’ (#1253) from gedankenstuecke/org:20260629-llm-proposal into main

        Like that stance I think

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Surprisingly, the Internet seems to look mostly favourably on Audacity these days. I never really kept up with it at the time, but apparently all the allegedly heinous (mis)features were opt-in. (Further verification of this may be required.)

      I can’t tell if that’s the result of a really good scrubbing of bad search results or whether they genuinely cleaned up their act.

      Either way, Tenacity, the fork that came about as a result of the controversy, still exists, and apparently has themes to change the look just like Audacity is claiming to have done now, so if you’re uncertain, that’s always an option.

      • MetaStatistical@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I got tired of Tenacity staying stagnant for months, and still having documentation link issues. Meanwhile, Audacity was actually making meaningful improvements.

        After diving deeper in the nontroversy, and seeing their in-depth video explaining their design decisions, I concluded that they genuinely want to improve the software and aren’t trying to fuck over the OSS community. So, I switched back when I dumped Windows and switched to Linux.

        There’s an extreme black and white view of these kinds of issues that crop up in the community that just pisses me off, and shoddy tech reporting doesn’t help matters. This wasn’t a “Oracle buys MySQL” situation, and the response didn’t deserve a fork. But, hey, it’s free software, and people can fork whatever they want.

        • Rose@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It wasn’t about “shoddy tech reporting”. Why would a FOSS audio editing app need to know your country, any personal “Data necessary for law enforcement, litigation and authorities’ requests (if any)”, share it with a wide network of people and potential buyers, as well as their “main office in Russia”? There should be no telemetry of any sort. Any logs kept should be strictly local, which would allow users to send them to the support team voluntarily.

          • Zagorath@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            It was to support the auto-update mechanism IIRC. It has to reach out to a server to do that, and the rest of the terms are just legal CYA for what could be possible based on that.

            • Rose@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t see how an auto-update feature would need any of those things either. The request is made by the remote user to the Audacity update server. Of course, Linux servers typically keep logs, but that would be one line saying that in order for the app to check for updates or to be updated, an IP address and connection timestamp may end up on the update server.

              • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                19 hours ago

                You really don’t realize that your ip address can tell them which country you’re in? So that they’re obligated to disclose in the terms that they have this info, and that if for some reason police ever come knocking, police would also get this info. Takes all of a minute to think about this.

                • Rose@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 minutes ago

                  Also your city and ISP, but that information isn’t mentioned, so it’s evident it wasn’t to catch all. Nothing in the way it’s worded is consistent with your rationale, and the actual policy is significantly more broad. They’re not specifying the information shared with law enforcement would be limited to the IP address or data that can be gathered from it. It’s a completely separate row.

            • nyan@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              Why would I want an auto-update mechanism in the software? That’s what my distro’s package manager is for. And it doesn’t care who I am or where I’m from. Nor has any other software I’ve encountered with such a useless-to-Linux-users mechanism demanded any information about me.

              In short, that rationale is obvious nonsense. That may be why they claim they’re doing it, but it doesn’t hold up.

                • Zagorath@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Yeah it’s a pretty wild mix of paranoia and technical ignorance from both Nyan and Rose here, hey?

                  If you’re that paranoid and that ideologically “pure”, compile it your fucking self. They made it trivial to remove.

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I remember when audacity was pure destructive editing, the mspaint of daws, like not quite notepad and sound recorder, but maybe wordpad. I think I still have a version of that old audacity installer somewhere…

        I always kept/keep a full licensed daw for real projects, and then audacity for when I wanted to do a quick edit or recording and didn’t want to boot up the big stuff.

        Is it worth getting anymore? Or is it trying to compete with real daws? And if so, is it competitive on the same level?

        • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’s much better than mspaint now but still as snappy. I think they removed overwriting the track while recording, though.

        • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Audacity is where you edit samples or record stems. A DAW is where you then use those samples and stems.

        • popcar2@piefed.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Audacity isn’t a fully fledged DAW, it’s an audio editor that’s mostly for recording, making quick edits, or fixing up audio. I don’t think it’s really possible to use it in music production yet.

        • palordrolap@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Is it worth getting?

          Maybe someone else will have a better answer. I used it once in a blue moon to naively hack at some audio, and will install it or Tenacity to do the same in future as and when the need arises. In fact, I’ll probably end up going for Audacity and a wary eye for telemetry opt-ins because Debian seems to have a native package for it. Tenacity seems to be Flatpak-only.

    • popcar2@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      When you start the app for the first time it asks if you want to enable anonymous telemetry, but otherwise I don’t think it sends anything.

  • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    About time! I was using an Adobe suite program for podcast editing years ago (Adobe didn’t get my money :P) and switched to Audacity.

    I’d used Audacity fairly regularly for about 15 years and let me tell you; it was jarring how bad it was compared to modern software. I already see some UI/UX improvements that should make it much more user friendly.

    • mirisgaiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      watched the video on this earlier… many of the things they list as new features have been in most audio software for a quarter of a century. up til now id rather hand someone $60 to buy reaper than recommend this thing, but it’s catching up fast much like freecad has been doing lately

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Back on in 2003 Adobe bought the freeware software called CoolEdit 2.0 and republished it as a paid product as Adobe Audition without changing a god damn thing.

      CoolEdit was too good to be true. It’s only fair that the developers got paid, but I just wish they didn’t have to sell out to Adobe of all companies.

      I hope this 2026 version of Audacity will finally be on level with what we had for free in year 2000.

      • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s misinformation.

        If the choice is between a new more polished Audacity or something that looks like old Audacity then refer to my earlier comment.

  • captain_spicard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know if they’re having an issue with the flatpak version or something but the UI feels broken, elements don’t line up and the text looks unusually small for the buttons. It also has problems with running a dark version, some UI elements are still white.

    Switched to Tenacity. Works good enough for me.

    • popcar2@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The Flatpak version is still stuck on Audacity 3, it hasn’t been updated in months.