Get your shortnames while the getting’s good.

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yeah it does, though it uses their own protocol (ATprotocol) they open sourced it too

    • axx@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The AT Protocol was open from the start. It’s not the issue and is actually rather clever in parts, in my limited understanding.

      The issue has more been that there was no way to run another server than the main one at first, and then that you could but it couldn’t interoperate. I understand this is now something of the past, but I don’t think I’ve ever come across a link to a bluesky post that wasn’t on bsky.app.

      Looking a bit into it, it looks like all you need to do is host a Personal Data Server (PDS): https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds?tab=readme-ov-file#self-hosting-a-pds

      • iForgotSpells@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        PDS is just one part of the whole thing. It’s just the place where your data is stored. Almost all other parts of the network are dependent on Bluesky’s stack. Even the alternatives like Blacksky and Eurosky are still dependent of Bluesky’s implementations like the Appview. So if Bluesky goes down, it affects the other services (in some way) too. One can host a PDS for cheap, but if you want a proper social media service (with post history, search etc), it is kind of expensive. There are other appviews, but for some reason Bluesky going down causes issues in Blacksky, Eurosky etc

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        then that you could but it couldn’t interoperate

        So now you can? I hope so…
        Anyway yeah, i never seen someone self host their own instance even though it should be possible