Get your shortnames while the getting’s good.

  • axx@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The AT Protocol was open from the start. It’s not the issue and is actually rather clever in parts, in my limited understanding.

    The issue has more been that there was no way to run another server than the main one at first, and then that you could but it couldn’t interoperate. I understand this is now something of the past, but I don’t think I’ve ever come across a link to a bluesky post that wasn’t on bsky.app.

    Looking a bit into it, it looks like all you need to do is host a Personal Data Server (PDS): https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds?tab=readme-ov-file#self-hosting-a-pds

    • iForgotSpells@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      PDS is just one part of the whole thing. It’s just the place where your data is stored. Almost all other parts of the network are dependent on Bluesky’s stack. Even the alternatives like Blacksky and Eurosky are still dependent of Bluesky’s implementations like the Appview. So if Bluesky goes down, it affects the other services (in some way) too. One can host a PDS for cheap, but if you want a proper social media service (with post history, search etc), it is kind of expensive. There are other appviews, but for some reason Bluesky going down causes issues in Blacksky, Eurosky etc

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      then that you could but it couldn’t interoperate

      So now you can? I hope so…
      Anyway yeah, i never seen someone self host their own instance even though it should be possible