“Generative” is a misnomer. It will never generate anything new, it can only regurgitate existing ideas based on patterns that already exist. It’s very good at pattern recognition and summarizing, but lacks the ability to form a distinct new idea.
It will never generate something novel. Whether it will generate something “new” depends on your definition of “new,” which is a little more ambiguous than “novel.”
“Generative” “AI” is about generation yes
“Generative” is a misnomer. It will never generate anything new, it can only regurgitate existing ideas based on patterns that already exist. It’s very good at pattern recognition and summarizing, but lacks the ability to form a distinct new idea.
Yeah, but it’s got that in common with a frighteningly large number of people…
See management, marketing, streaming, social media, etc…
If that’s your reasoning then genes and genetics fall into the same bucket.
It will never generate something novel. Whether it will generate something “new” depends on your definition of “new,” which is a little more ambiguous than “novel.”
Sorry if I’m being too pedantic.
Sure, but then neither will most people.
Shhh… Let the haters hate. Hate is all they have. It’s the only thing that makes them feel superior.