• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      The question is how much money did they make by using Android to block rivals. If using Android helped them make 1bn extra then this fine costs them 3bn and it doesn’t make sense from them to keep doing it. If they made 100bn than obviously they will continue.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        I mean, with it they’ve managed to build a walled garden that includes the majority of every phone in the world.

        We can probably assume trillions.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    significant investment to ensure Android remains open.

    Unless you want to install apps not from the google app store. Or develop apps not for the google app store. Or use a Captcha without having google services. Or use your bank website without google services. or use the internet without chrome. or… shit, sorry, I don’t have time to list all the ways google wants the exact opposite of anything anywhere remaining “open” unless by “open” they mean “open to google’s exploitation”.

  • tirateimas@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Now lets use part of that money, to fund the development of open alternatives and interoperable protocols / standards. We cannot break a duopoly, if there aren’t any alternatives, otherwise it will keep being a duopoly.

  • disorderly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Google’s behavior in this debacle has been utterly shameful. They got caught with their dick in the pie and have spent 8 fucking years arguing that it was for the good of society.