• Noja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is there a pornhub app? I don’t think so.

      Apple is fighting pornographic material reaching iPhones via downloads from the newly mandated competitors to Apple’s App Store. [source]

      Also, they claim that these are “nudify” apps, but they are just faceswap tools?

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    While I agree they shouldn’t be there… This is exactly why we shouldn’t have centralized control.

    Because yesterday it was the anti ICE apps. Today it’s these. Tomorrow it can and be anything.

    Living through this has taught me that while I was a strong federalist to try and guarantee rights and build out what I think will help society, it only takes one rogue faction to turn it all against you.

    • gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Living through this has taught me that while I was a strong federalist to try and guarantee rights and build out what I think will help society

      the thing i’ve learned is that even if there’s no fascist, and everybody does their best, things can still go horribly wrong because cultural differences aren’t respected. for example, in one country, tattoos are illegal because they’re associated with organized crime. in one small village though, tattoos are an ancient and sacred art and outlawing them does a lot of harm. so even when the politicians try their best to “clean up the place”, cultural differences lead to damage to minorities. that’s why federal politics shouldn’t regulate anything that’s non-commercial. in general, this is a reply to your comment, and has nothing to do with this post specifically.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I disagree that federal politics shouldn’t regulate anything non-commercial. I would argue that its primary purpose should be to enshrined minimal standards for, among other things, things like civil liberties. Part of establishing and protecting civil libierties means regulating discrimination and disenfranchisement to AT LEAST a baseline of equality across every state.

        • gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          yeaah the US has a lot of special history. preventing slavery is an important task of the fed. gov.

          yet i see the problems that overall fed. gov. interference with own personal life can do.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 days ago

    Same Apple and Google who say we aren’t safe unless we let them choose which apps are on our phones?

    • mspencer712@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Your phrasing is a little off but I hear your frustration and sympathize with you. App Store creators say what cannot be installed, when it comes to third party apps. They generally don’t auto install things unless they make them OS components. Your phone’s network provider is the one loading apps you can’t uninstall, generally.