I’ve been hearing about these for a few years now. Huge if they work out at a large scale.

  • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    According to Wikipedia:

    Looks like power to weight it much higher, while energy per volume and energy per mass is comparable to existing lithium ion batteries.

      • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        See, that’s what I thought, but the wiki article seems to disagree.

        Or am I just misreading something?

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      idk about that, the regularly cited reason Na-ion batteries are mainly being looked at for grid storage rather than vehicle applications is their bad Wh/l and W/kg numbers compared to Li-ion. the table in the Na-ion article seems to use “1000W/kg” without a source, and it shows lithium as being about a third of that even though the Li-ion article quotes figures up to 10kW/kg.

      seems the editors of the two articles aren’t cross-checking eachother.

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        The “1000W/kg” figure appears to be from Wikipedia, which claims https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-article/sodium-ion-batteries-will-diversify-the-energy-storage-industry/30405 as a source. Wikipedia has the information in a table flagged as “Needs update”.

        Anyway, most of the lithium-ion chemistry variations drop off relatively fast in capacity over repeated charge cycles (the exception being LiFePo4). If the sodium-ion chemistry is better that way, and drops off less in the cold, it’s still worth exploring for vehicle use even if the energy density is a little lower.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          In colder climates, the lower density could be offset by better performance in cold. This is why sodium has made it to large mining trucks.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          from other comments it seems the energy density of batteries currently on the market is about 2/3rds that of lithium cells.

          there’s also the asymmetry to worry about: with a max discharge rate of 8C but a charge rate of 3C there could potentially be limits on regen braking. if i’m understanding it correctly, sodium cells degrade quickly at higher charge rates.

          • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Interesting, but from what I understand limited charging would only be a problem if you do not have large enough battery capacity. So for heavier vehicles with larger capacity this might not matter much.

            PS: This video about the CATL NaFePO4 battery also mentions a “half sodium half lithium” battery pack for cars to combine the best of both.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Googling says 175 whr/kg for catls sodium car battery that’s already in production cars vs 270 whr/kg for Tesla’s lithium.

        • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Probably numbers for the raw cell though, not the balancing and cooling which could make sodium a bit more competitive.

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        ion. the table in the Na-ion article seems to use “1000W/kg” without a source, and it shows lithium as being about a third of that even though the Li-ion article quotes figures up to 10kW/kg.

        seems the editors of the two articles aren’t cross-checking eachother.

        No, it seems like you have zero idea what you are talking about and are confusing W/kg with Wh/kg, which are very different metrics