You’re the one saying pressed cds are digital, what makes a pressed cd digital? You’re just wrong dude.

An optical disc is a flat, usually[a] disc-shaped object that stores information in the form of physical variations on its surface that can be read with a beam of light. Optical discs can be reflective, where the light source and detector are on the same side of the disc, or transmissive, where light shines through the disc to be detected on the other side. They may contain analog or digital information, or a mixture of the two. Their main uses are the distribution of electronic media and data, and archival storage.

A cd is only one type of optical drive, and not all cds are digital, if they’re pressed, they’re analog. Like vinyl.

What are you even on about man I never said vinyl is digital,

Yes you did. A pressed cds and vinyl are the same thing, if one is analog, the other HAS to be too.

obviously an analog format

Like a pressed CD should obviously be analog too…? That’s the point lmfao.

And before you asininely claim that a laser makes it digital. There is laser vinyl readers does that somehow make vinyl a digital media…? No, so why would CDs be different?

So you’re implying that vinyls also encode digital data? Because that clearly wrong, vinyl is analog. That’s the entire point. Did you miss that…?

If pressed vinyl is analog, than pressed cds have to be too, they’re the exact same process even. Why would you argue otherwise? Do you not understand how pressing is analog data…? You think that pressing vinyl, and pressing a cd somehow makes one digital and the other analog? That makes no fucking sense lol.

Wikipedia doesn’t even agree with you, and says what you’re saying is absolute complete bullshit lmfao.

They may contain analog or digital information, or a mixture of the two. T

Records aren’t considered digital media though (atleast not by anyone who knows what they are I guess), that’s what a pressed disc is. You do understand that a pressed cd is completely different than burned ones…. yeah?

Even if they’re pressed?

Yet that wasn’t the point they even made! Lmfao nice reaching there.

Those would be the same type of points a human would make to accomplish the task.

You seem to be ignoring the facts. It was told the image was fake, and told to explain why. Even a human that knows it’s real would still do what was presented to it.

The person told the ai a very specific thing to do, with not room for variance, it wasn’t even stated as a question, they made a demand and any human in the same position would act the same way. If you’re expecting to have to tell a human a 100 times that “yes the image is real, can you do the task presented” is more efficient and better then it being done?

Now you could also present the task as both being able to question it, the ai would follow instructions better.

Back to situation one, while with the human you would be constantly interrupted, is that a good employee or subject? Or one you would immediately replace as it can’t even follow basic instructions? Ai or human, you would point to do the task at hand, yes critical thinking is important, but not for this stupid task. Stop applying instructions and context that never existed in the first place. In a one for one example, the Ai would question too, if you can’t understand this, you shouldn’t be commenting on Ai.

Ai sucks, but don’t ignore reality to make your asinine point.

Wait, you’re surprised it did what you asked of it?

There’s a massive difference between asking if something is fake, and telling it it is and asking why.

A person would make the same type of guesses and explanations if given the same task.

All this is showing is, you and ALOT of other people just don’t know enough about AI to be able to have a conversation about it.

It even says “suggests” in it, it’s making no claim that it’s real or fake. The lack of basic comprehension is the issue here.