Founder of craigslist is showing why making it in life alone does not lead to billionaire status. If you get rich but have values, you reach a point of feeling rich enough.

But if you take it literally it can be any head you see right, because you’re not seeing it within the scope of the idiom but the scope of your direct surrounding? Otherwise nvm, i’m not a native speaker so whatever.

I heard something like OpenAI (or Anthropic?) tweaked one of their AI’s to do well on a certain benchmark test and while they did have the highest score they couldn’t publish the model because it used like $20,000 in electricity alone to make sure it’s answer was correct.

Actually i think in English you say you hit the nail on the head, so if you take it literally you can pick any head you like. In Dutch you’d say you hit a nail on it’s head which is much clearer to someone who takes it literally.

There is two truths to this: not 100% of the company exchanged hands. The part that hasn’t changed hands only lost perceived value, no money has moved. The part that is exchanging hands is real people losing and winning real money.

So every investor who had faith in SpaceX as a central supporting column of the USAs future in space

It’s not like they’re investing to help SpaceX or the country or whoever, they’re just as self-interested as wall street and SpaceX executives. Sucks for them they got conned, but there were plenty of warning signs it was overvalued.

Is it your taste or your imagination that is so limited?