

interesting. i wonder why they did this, just symbolic domination?


interesting. i wonder why they did this, just symbolic domination?


no they didn’t.


I don’t know what recent events you mean, but in general I think such rules are overrated. Moderators can remove spam without an explicit rule against spam. Trying to list every possible behavior that a community would reject is never really feasible, we have to rely on human intuition anyway


W for Mint!


Ooh, that’s neat. Reminds me of Khanacademy


your claim was “that’s not a fuckin thing in the least”, so if they exist even in “weird places”, your claim was wrong.


i have definitely seen proton fanboys.


that’s horrible, what the hell area do you live in?


This is a really cool idea, and I’ve seen some similar ones before but nothing this concrete. Though, I do think blackbrook’s comment makes a good point that a hierarchy of categories might be the wrong approach. Would a tag-like system be possible instead? Looking at the list, I’m thinking many sites span many of these categories.
It reminds me of my own project, https://detailed-game-search.com/, which uses tags organized by applicability and an entry can have any number of tags, but there’s many tricky edge cases that I’m not sure how to solve.
948 is an absurd number to bugs to find at one time. i bet most of them are fake. i’ve seen the “bugs” AI likes to find