Lmao the article literally admits the data is cherry picked and only applied on “a limited scale”

deleted by creator

Sure lol. It’s not true when you use cherry picked stats, for cars that only drive in areas literally curated for them.

Wow you’re trying really hard to shill for these AI cars. Imagine downplaying a 50% increase in death rate

Funny how you ignored this part too:

the analysis excluded minor incidents involving Waymos that would likely not have been reported to the police had a human been driving,”

I only ever played Sims 1

These kinds of articles are frustrating because they also kill people’s trust in science. The scientists say one thing and the “journalists” twist it into clickbait bs. Now the term “Earth-like planet” means practically nothing. Venus would be considered an “Earth-like planet” by these standards.

The far side will be very cold, but there will be some heat transfer through the atmosphere so it doesn’t necessarily mean life can’t exist there.

Libre office got me through college without having to pay for ms office… which they still charged for even with a student discount.