It’s not just log files - I was running a bad version of some software and suddenly my VPS was cryptomining and they tried to export common config directories. They got nothing and I cleaned it up but I’m not letting my VPS join a botnet and attack others. If the side effect of that is that Nigerians cannot read my person blog or access my self hosted services with 30 users I think this is ok.

I’ll happily accept your ire as I also wish the internet was generally safer and more open.

Also I’m not selling anything so that EU law wouldn’t apply to my services even if I did host them in the EU or provide services to the EU.

I am not in the US! Nor are my services hosted somewhere where this is relevant.

Tell that to the guy in Lagos I had to report a few years ago for breaching one of my personal services. Nigerian Police have a dedicated Cybercrime division and they didn’t even reply to my report through their official channels. Sorry, but Nigeria went on the geoblocklist! I have a right to not expose myself to undue risk.

The difference is that commercial VPNs are theoretically more beholden to regulatory bodies to shutdown bad traffic/provide subscriber information when so ordered by a court. With a commercial VPN you have a legal recourse against a bad actor. With residential proxies enforcement is much much harder, as traversing beyond the IP hosting the proxy to the TA is often not possible. I also use a VPN to get around content restrictions and have no qualms about their use. Residential proxies are typically bad for everyone except TAs and people who might not have access to traditional VPNs due to their local governments.

Man I’m replying while visiting family in a non-western aligned occupied territory “overseas” to NA. I know. I region block anyways and VPN into Europe/NA when needed, where at least my traffic originates from a VPN’S AS where someone can be made to revoke my access if I abuse it.

Overseas is generally used for “across an ocean”. As this is an NA based publication, “overseas” would likely be Europe, Africa, Asia, Oceania.

Malicious traffic frequently originates from at least one place in every one of those continents. We were breached some time ago by a TA using a residential proxy to send traffic from a Ukr AS block that got around our firewall. Blocking all traffic from regions of the world that you have no intention of servicing is a very valid cybersecurity layer. Getting annoyed because someone used the phrase “overseas” to describe areas to be suspicious of I think is rather short sighted from a security point of view.

Very few cyber attacks come from domestic/near domestic sources, except from botnets and residential proxies. The world will not miss residential proxies.

Let me guess, you’ve never tried to host anything public yourself. If you run fail2ban long enough you end up with a blocklist that heavily skews towards a particular set of countries. Residential proxies are regularly used in criminal activity. I’ve personally and professionally been impacted by TAs using residential proxies to get around firewall rules as part of compromises.

If authorities in those countries took action against TAs and scammers more aggressively, perhaps blocking their entire country wouldn’t be seen as a valid defensive approach.

Saying there’s no typescript runtime is (imo) a bit pedantic - if you JIT transpile TS down to JS at run time with hot-reloading you’re effectively a TS runtime. For a non-technical one-liner on Bun, I feel that is a very reasonable simplification to make.

Perhaps bun would be even faster if they bound against another JS API, but that doesn’t mean that Bun isn’t faster than Node.js. They claim it’s 3x faster than Node in aggregate, and that can potentially be true even if they use slower machinery under the hood. Python is a slow language but a fast framework can outperform a poorly written C++ implementation.

I’m not going to defend the article, I have no horse in that race, but until I see benchmarks that say Bun isn’t faster than Node in aggregate, I don’t think the claim can be called “wrong” on its face.

E: that’s exactly what Bun does: “Bun supports TypeScript and JSX with no configuration. Bun transpiles every file on the fly with its native transpiler before running it.”

https://bun.com/

HTML title: Bun: A fast all-in-one JavaScript runtime

Bun is designed as a drop-in replacement for Node.js

https://bun.com/docs/runtime

execute javascript/typescript files […] with Bun’s fast runtime.

Am I missing something? How is that claim incorrect? I’ve never used Bun but their marketing material lines up exactly with the claim.