They did express their displeasure. Even said please

If it’s “not strictly defined” and used when it’s convenient, then it’s meaningless.

If the term is meaningless or counter-intuitive jargon, then it shouldn’t be included in a headline.

If openAI has an “unproven business model” they’re not a startup they’re a failed business living off of borrowed and leveraged assets.

I keep hearing about this, but I’m certain there must be some drawback

The difference between “this is true” and “this was true ten years ago” is huge.

Presenting one as the other is why you’re being challenged