22·
8 days ago@joe they are not separable. Just like concerns about fair compensation for visual artists and writers are inseparable from “AI”.
Noted: my question remains unanswered.
Sally Strange
Chronic illness, probably neurodivergent. White & anti-whiteness. #SolarPunk #Climate #DeGrowth #StrawBale #LivingMachine #Construction #Engineering #Crochet #GreenBuilding #SciFi #Anarchy
Liberals DNI. Just kidding, I love you liberals. Don’t block me just because I’m right
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 8 years ago
Cake day: August 30th, 2018
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
@joe if it’s a tool for doctors to use then it will simply increase the costs of providing care even if there is an increase in the quality of that care. That means adoption of that particular type of “AI” will be limited. If it’s possible to replace doctors with a chatbot, that will decrease costs even if the quality of care also decreases.
Which one do you think is more likely to be widely used in a profit-driven, anti-human system?
@joe seems pretty clear to me.
-“AI” isn’t inevitable
-people who claim otherwise are mostly doing marketing for products in which they’re invested
-experts on “AI” should include more than those employed by the companies trying to make a profit off it
Yudkowsky was not a non sequitur; you were asked which experts you consult, you then refused to name any, so your interlocutor tried speculating about who might qualify for you.
Hope this helps, Joe!
@XLE