For me MPV is the best.

  • WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Why not both?

    edit: wtf are these replies :D

    edit2: also to clarify my original comment was meant as both are good. For example you can’t easily install MPV on Bazzite and VLC does as good of a job. I do tend to use MPV over VLC but I don’t ever crave the other one as I have at least one of those available. I did run into few videos that I had issues running with MPV and vice-versa but those are rare and specific cases. Always the other player did the job so I also can’t say that both are perfect.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      This mindset contributes to bloat, unless it is needed. Or install the alternative when really needed.

            • WereCat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              IMO bloat is something that is on your PC which YOU did not install and you actively want to get rid off. Also something that you don’t use and is just running in the background using resources. Otherwise it’s not bloat, it just takes some space on the drive and has no other negative effect on anything. It just sits there waiting to be used. You could at that point argue that your old photo album is bloat because you’re not actively looking at the pictures.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                oh you’re the thread starter! ahem…

                i find the first reply to yours absolutely insane and completely off-base. so i continued in the same vein. turns out the guy was being completely serious.

                • WereCat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  All good. I wasn’t meaning to reply to you before but to the guy you’ve originally replied to :)

            • flameleaf@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              This seems simultaneously overkill and extremely minimalist at the same time.

              Firefox can open videos, but if I try to skip ahead on a HEVC encode I only get audio and there’s performance issues in general. Also no way to change audio tracks and no subtitles.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          No thanks. I use a fast video player to play a video, instead loading up a browser all the time. Using a separate video player is not bloat. Using two separate video player for the same task is bloat, when it is not needed. Don’t compare browsers to video players.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            all major browsers have built-in fully functioning video players, ergo they are video players. and most people have a browser running anyway so startup is likely faster than a standalone application. using a separate video player is bloat. same with music players, and text editors, and pdf viewers.

            the browser is truly the new emacs.

            • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              Using a full blown browser to do everything is bloat. I keep using optimized tools for specific tasks. You completely changed the topic. It was about using two programs for the same task. Video players are optimized to play videos. I try to avoid using bloated browsers that does everything, but nothing well (besides browsing web) and fill the RAM for no reason.

              • Bloat Browser = bloat
              • Optimized video player to play videos = not bloat
              • Two optimized video player to play videos when not really needed = bloat

              Hope that is clear now. I tried to make it simple and understandable as possible. The guy asked why not install both video players and I gave him a reason not to do. There was no browser in the discussion until you brought it up.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                using a full-blown operating system to do everything is bloat when the browser can already do it all. just kernel and browser should be enough.

                • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I don’t know if you are trolling, but that is a nonsense reply. The original question was why not install MPV and VLC at the same time. I don’t use a browser for everything, because its bloat. I use dedicated applications that does one job, and does it well. You can keep using your browser for everything, but that is not what this post topic is about.

                  • lime!@feddit.nu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    using a computer is bloat when the browser can use it for you. i have a second computer just running selenium to use my computer for me.