• bigmclargehuge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    It was a replacement for node.js and npm that was supposed to be faster and had other things built in like minifying and bundling iirc.

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Did they deliver? Was it worth the hype?

      I’ve heard about them from time to time. Been rather curious myself, but never really had the chance to use it.

      • immutable@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I tried it out for a few hobby side projects as someone that doesn’t do much JavaScript development.

        It delivered on the dev experience. I didn’t have to learn how to plug a bunch of random tools together because bun had a lot of the basic stuff just bundled in.

        Task runner, test runner, typescript, etc.

        I think if I spent more time doing JavaScript development work it wouldn’t have really mattered, that project bootstrapping is a one time cost and if you know how to do it it’s cheap enough. As someone that spends most of their time writing other languages though it was nicer than figuring out how to get a bunch of tools to play nice with each other.

      • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I heard of people using it on hobby projects.

        Don’t know of any firm using it in production. Node.js never really had scale issues that needed addressing.

        I’ve moved more towards deno recently. No real desire for bun on my end

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        One nice thing about bun was/is that you can feed it TypeScript files directly, to run them locally. No need to transpile first. Much like deno.