• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The knowledge is retained and owned by a private corporation who now does not have to share what may have been a still under copyright, but now the corporation owns it? Make it make sense.

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes. That does make sense.

        If you bought a book, scanned it—destroying it in the process—then read it on your computer, that would be completely acceptable.

        Why is it wrong when a corporation does the same thing?

        They’re not claiming ownership of the copyrights, just ownership of a copy. Which is how copyright works.

        • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          Now we just need to proof they’ve copied the files onto a second hard drive, so they own two copies

          If we’re gonna keep it as a copyright issue, I think people are mostly mad they’re not able to reprint the books themselves if they wanted to. We’re not speaking from a copyright position