return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoAI agents meant to replace Meta workers made “large-scale, disruptive actions”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1162arrow-down13
arrow-up1159arrow-down1external-linkAI agents meant to replace Meta workers made “large-scale, disruptive actions”arstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square25linkfedilink
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agodo some of those protections not involve expensive machinery (like sawstop saws)?
minus-squareh0tbeef@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoWouldn’t something like that be machinery the saw company already owns? Does slop not involve expensive machinery?
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·3 days agomostly thinking if you could shave off the administrative employees (like finance and marketing) you could fall below the limit)
minus-squareh0tbeef@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoThe limit for what? The bottom line is that AI is both more expensive and less productive than humans for at least 99% of tasks
do some of those protections not involve expensive machinery (like sawstop saws)?
Wouldn’t something like that be machinery the saw company already owns?
Does slop not involve expensive machinery?
mostly thinking if you could shave off the administrative employees (like finance and marketing) you could fall below the limit)
The limit for what?
The bottom line is that AI is both more expensive and less productive than humans for at least 99% of tasks