• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    We’ve been told historical lies. People who have an issue with this are like Luddites, but that’s because the Luddites were justified too!

    They weren’t against technology; they were against it being used to abuse and exploit them as workers.

    • Haley@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ve only heard that term being used to insult, that’s actually a real thing?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        9 hours ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddites

        The Luddites were members of a 19th-century movement of English textile workers who protested the usage of certain types of automated machinery owing to their concerns relating to worker pay, labour savings, child labour, working conditions, and output quality. They often destroyed said machines in organised raids. Members of the group referred to themselves as Luddites, self-described followers of “Ned Ludd”, a legendary weaver whose name was used as a pseudonym in threatening letters to mill owners and government officials.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’ve never heard it used as an insult. How is it even supposed to be offensive? “Har har you’re a person who doesn’t like tech”?

        • plateee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Less of “you’re a person who doesn’t like tech” and more “you’re not with the times/are scared of the future”… which is pretty close to some messaging from clankers.