• kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cornell researchers found that at the current rate of AI growth, the burgeoning industry could represent 24 to 44 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions by 2030

    The United States emitted 4.9 billion tonnes of CO₂ in 2024.

    So by 2030 the AI industry CO2 release might be 0.9% of total US emissions.

    That ‘almost’ in “Almost Incomprehensible” is doing a lot of work there.

    • 800XL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Listen, an AI waifu is worth the increased speed of destruction to the planet.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You: “How much will this speed up our doom?”

        Your waifu: “Calculating… oh, it’s actually less than 1%.”

        tears in your eyes the Old Yeller soundtrack starts playing

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again.

      I love Lemmy math nerds and honestly appreciate how there’s always at least one to put things in perspective for those of us who worked really fucking hard to get a C in college algebra. Cheers.

        • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          A huge amount too, 37.9%

          But more than one thing can be bad a time, a novel idea, I know

          And how many beef farms are there compared to data centers? A lot of a lot more.

          If a tiny amount of physical space can do such a large amount of pollution, that’s a worry, when the plan is to increase the amount of them.

          • r1veRRR@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well, sure, but when everyone loses their fucking minds about the tiniest thing, that even requires us to buy all the lies from billionaires about how much the build out will be, while having never done anything about the biggest thing they could personally change, it starts sounding mightily hypocritical.

            It seems like the personal responsibility to boycott polluting and unnecessary industries is limited to whatever doesn’t require any personal effort from the person speaking.

            Napkin math:

            • 40% of americans are very or extremely concerned about AIs environmental impact
            • To save 34 million tonnes of CO2e, you need about 5.2 million vegans from now until 2030
            • So only 5% of ONLY the complainers would need to go vegan to make up for this “tremendous” impact
            • That’s 2% of all americans

            That’s the thing we’re even attacking random strangers online for. The thing that we pretend is going to bring about the end times. But sure, veganism is the extreme position…

            By the way, what other resources are we saving?

            • Water — about 8.8 trillion gallons (~33 billion m³)
            • Land — around 1–1.5 million acres of forest/land
            • Animals — roughly 8 billion animals including fish and shellfish
            • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              More than one thing can be bad.

              Why don’t we do both? Less AI, Less Meat

              Also, I’m not American, don’t insult me by assuming I’m one

                • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  So less food variety and I get trash for the trade, are you the White run merchant buying any random crap the Dragonborn drags in by any chance?

                  • iopq@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    Listen, I didn’t say you can’t ever eat meat. Just eat a single patty hamburger instead of a double. It’s not less food variety, it’s called not gorging yourself on things that are bad for your heart health.

                  • iopq@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Bad for heart health, unless it’s chicken which already has much lower emissions in the first place

                • iopq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  A quarter of Americans eating more chicken because it’s better for the environment is even more realistic. Chicken is tasty!

            • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              2 days ago

              Personally I’ll never go Vegan simply out of spite because no matter what is being discussed there’s ALWAYS some asshole inserting veganism into the topic.

              Veganism might be great for the environment, but as long as you(they) continue to act worse than especially obnoxious Jehovah’s Witnesses, veganism can go fuck itself.

              If I devoured one cow every time some vegan asshole spoke up in a thread that was on a completely different topic, cows would be extinct.

              • Hond@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                What a whiny little bitch you are.

                I’m not even vegan. But meat eating morons signal posting that they’re sick of vegans are way more common and annoying than vocal vegans.

                Its such a overplayed prejudice for as long as i can remember. I came across overreaching vegans which actually annoyed me maybe five times in my life. Signalposting meat heads are more like a weekly occurance.

                Random vegan at a bbq “hey, can i have small sliver of aluminum foil for my stuff and if you guys dont half intentionally wrench the meat juices over my veggies, that would be cool”
                What always follows: 10-30 minute moronic rant of some meathead because eating meat is his whole personality.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Consider how rapidly they have been built, and the capitalists’ plans to make many many more. Now also consider the state of the planet’s ecology and the already terrible effects of climate change.

      To me, it’s incomprehensible that regular people haven’t already revolted against the death spiral the capitalist class has put us on.

      • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Can you name a moment in time when regular people did stand in solidarity and revolt against something that wasn’t already at the point of causing them grave, direct, unavoidable, and consistent harm?

          • HieroProtagonist@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The French that started by beheading kings and nobles… and shortly after anyone who had a slightly different opinion? The French who shortly after that madness had a new Emperor? THAT French?

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Abolitionists are an easy example.

          Now if you mean a majority of people, yeah not really. But people in general, it happens.

    • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      To me it seems the root of the problem is that humanity depends on fossil fuels for energy.

      AI data centers are just one of many things contributing to CO2 emisions.

      Lond tsory short, humanity needs to start getting it’s energy from non CO2 emmiting sources (solar, wind, hydro, and nuclear).

      • AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        “AI data centers are just one of many things contributing to CO2 emisions.”

        A useful perspective is to reverse how we frame the causative logic here; the fossil fuel industry is contributing to the AI data centre madness. There’s a lot of evidence of fossil fuel executives and lobbyists pushing for AI because it helps to justify their existence in a world where renewable energy isn’t just cleaner, it’s cheaper.

        What this means is that we have two problems to solve when it comes to CO2 emissions:

        • Humanity’s apparent level of dependence on fossil fuels, when accounting for deliberately wasteful endeavours like mega data centres. and
        • Humanity’s actual level of dependence on fossil fuels. This is higher than it should be and requires some changes to society to improve, but it’s not nearly as high as it might seem at a glance.

        These are both problems we need to solve, but the method is different for esch