• unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Maybe that’s what it was. It doesn’t necessarily need to be that going forward, as project putlooks anf goals change with time.

    Also editing is quite a lot of more work to support than mere viewing. As all tools and actions need to behave correctly - not jusbt the renderer.

    And something proprietary can hadly be a “industry standard”. It can be “most common” or a “de facto standard”. But all “industry standards” are by definition open as any industry worth its weight doesn’t rely on or include a single point of failure anywhere within itself.

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “It doesn’t necessarily need to be that going forward”

      This part does not make any sense. Making GIMP to be able to support any image format is a good thing. Especially for future file preservation.

      If it was merely industry standard, if a software already good, people will just use the default format. It already happen with various industries, like comic making in Asia using .CLIP (Clip Studio Paint) instead of .PSD

      • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Especially for future file preservation.

        Case in point, the best office suite for both the old .doc file format and the previous (from 2013 and before) .docx file format is LibreOffice.