• krashmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    please tell me they’re prioritizing minimizing the existential cost of the climate catastrophe over the $ cost

    I’m sure you know that’s not the case. It’s always about the money.

    That said, I would guess that these function similarly to hybrid car engines. Electric motors are better at providing a quick or variable torque rsponse and gas engines are most efficient running at a constant RPM. Put those properties together and you get an electric motor designed for takeoff and large altitude changes, and a gas motor designed for maintaining cruising speed.

    Essentially, the exact opposite of what you wanted.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m pretty sure it’s exactly that. Electric engines during takeoff and landing would also decrease noise pollution near humans.