• Eh-I@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      But then there’ll be a shortage and the prices will start to rise an then nobody will be able to affo-😂😂😂

      jk eat shit nvidia

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The US bombed a girl’s school in the opening salvos against Iran because their AI fucked up.

      Missiles that miss their target still hit something.

    • lil_baka@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Rocket missing a military target sometimes means a rocket incidentally hitting a civilian object, so not good. All kinds of rockets and drones are used to hit targets in all major cities. They’re not only used for some standalone objects in the middle of nowhere.

        • gergo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          15 hours ago

          to paraphrase an old american air force saying, russian missiles have 100% accuracy, they always hit something

      • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        true, but giving ai control is asking for much more bad targeting and collateral damages

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Not really. If confirmed, it means someone somewhere was smart enough to do something like drive across a border in a truck with fake papers. It’s very, very unlikely that Nvidia directly sold to anyone in a way that would get them in trouble.

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No. First, need to verify.
      Second, need to investigate how they got it. Might be not Nvidia’s fault.
      Third, capitalism will be the end of most of us.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s the NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB. From the Ampere family, 3.5 years old. Small Tegra SoC.

    I guess something like this is a typical dual use good, and doesn’t fall under the AI Chip export restriction either because it’s too weak. Seems like it would be trivial for Russians to import them from China or India or whomever really.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s actually a lot more recent than I expected. Was guessing something fairly ancient and pre-sanctions, like 2018. Interesting.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        As the other commenter said, likely from China. The US banned exports of the super high-end chips to China IIRC, but not low-end stuff. And India is known to sell anything to anyone as well.

        • bomibantai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          23 hours ago

          India does not have a state controlled economy, unlike China. What would be the issue if an Indian company sold non sanctioned goods to an ally? Or are you just an ignorant racist?

    • kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Apple once advertised their new PowerMac G4 was so powerful it was classified as a munition and hence illegal to export. (this was stretching the truth a bit as the regulation allowing export of over 1 gigaflops machines had already passed)

    • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The fucktard who made the Oculus Rift likes to use my preferred operating system to kill people. Tech is a wild world.

      Edit: actually not just tech. Capitalism is just evil in general and polutes everything both literally and metaphorically

      We live in a world where it’s sorta just widely understood that the bottled-water chocolate-bar company murders people for profit on the regular

      It’s all fucked at every level

      • mcheva@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 day ago

        Palmer Luckey is the goofiest looking cunt out hey. Imagine looking at yourself in the mirror with that stupid goatee and thinking you know what would go well with this, a hawaian shirt. Imagine having so much but being worth so little. What a fucken loser.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        But but shareholder value of artificial money funneling system which has totally fair rules we made up and misuse.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can tell who is evil by their company being named after Lord of the Rings lore.

      • Zacryon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Linux devs usually don’t make a business out of it though. That’s the thing about FOSS: you do not have much control over what people do with it.

        • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Linux devs usually don’t make a business out of it though.

          Horrible to imagine, finding Russian missile software on Gitlab.

          That’s the thing about FOSS: you do not have much control over what people do with it.

          That’s the thing about FOSS licensing, at least legally. Depending on which one you choose it controls what people do with it quite a lot.

          • Zacryon@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            About licensing:
            Yes and no. Plenty of people or companies just don’t care and it can be hard to prove otherwise. And in the context of military software, well… I doubt russian software devs are even allowed to publish anything related, despite the respective FOSS possibly requiring it.

    • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      Always have been. Orin nano/nx SoMs are in all sorts of weapons systems. NixOS had a whole community civil war because Anduril heavily adopted NixOS and integrated it with Jetpack, the BSP that these run. They’re kind of a PITA to use (fuck you WayneWWW…IYKYK) but they’re easily the highest performance SoM of that size and the power consumption is workable for these kinds of…short lived systems. I think they started out targeting automotive applications and never really took off in the commercial world despite being comparable to Apple silicon in performance because they have no power saving modes. They ended up being perfect for doing real time object detection from a MIPI camera though so now they’re the gold standard for bleeding edge slaughterbots.

      Before the Orin, a lot of more experimental systems were using the TX2i and Xavier modules, but they had much less computing power and the image recognition models weren’t as capable anyway.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Interesting, thanks. I’ve seen NixOS requirements in german military projects. And it is very interesting looking at western downed drone teardowns in the Ukraine. I kept looking for NVidia logo there.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      All of the tech giants discovered that there is much more money to be made making tech for dystopian authoritarian governments than gamers. It was inevitable I guess.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just look at the long, long, LONG list of American and European companies helping Israel murder little children…

      • Sims@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        much more money to be made making tech for dystopian authoritarian governments

        Like the US/western Oligarch Regimes for instance…

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a more efficient, direct, and profitable method for destroying the planet.

      See also almost all “technology” under capitalism.

  • disorderly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    As someone with previous defense connections, I’d been wondering when we’d see this.

    ITAR has severely restricted access to nav system tech export, but there was always this open question about reckoning position by visual cues rather than GPS + dead reckoning. We all knew it was technically feasible, but we assumed that having “visual” cues was further out because AI at the time wasn’t up to the task.

    The answer is the same, though. Nvidia, willing or not, is now a defendant in an unjust war, and must be subpoena’d by the ICC. At a minimum, they should be immediately sanctioned by foundry specialists (like ASML) until they are prepared to account for how, exactly, this tech ended up in a Russian missile.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Lots of cheap plane-type drones do terrain navigation now. And the Russians are busily deploying their military version of Starlink.

    • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Current defense worker here:

      Was talking with a coworker recently about how ITAR/EAR rules are hilariously out of date. Basic IMUs coming from China these days are good enough that you can establish a reasonable dead reckoning nav to where those parts of the munitions list are just defunct. Shit I did that in college ten years ago with high power rockets and things have only gotten better.

      The new proposed regulations over AI chips are also wildly misguided and demonstrate how Congress/Executive branch have no idea what the tech even is. The top of the line chips today are needed for LLMs, fast fixture acquisition and tracking can be done on a way less powerful piece of hardware that new regulations will fail to stop (that’s even assuming that the bans would have worked in the first place, which they won’t)

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nvidia, willing or not, is now a defendant in an unjust war, and must be subpoena’d by the ICC.

      Subpoenas only exist in the US. Since it did not sign the Rome treaty, and since Nvidia is an American company - the ICC has no power here.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      ITAR has severely restricted access to nav system tech export, but there was always this open question about reckoning position by visual cues rather than GPS + dead reckoning. We all knew it was technically feasible, but we assumed that having “visual” cues was further out because AI at the time wasn’t up to the task.

      There’s always going back to the old-fashioned method of having a trained pigeon inside of the device instead of a sophisticated computer vision system.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It might not even be for vision applications. These little tegra boxes end up in all sorts of rapid prototype DSP applications. It could easy be doing comms or ECM.

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plenty of western tech still ends up in Russian weapons, it’s nothing new. NVidia should be just put in queue.

        • madmantis24@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          If I can’t buy lower-priced Chinese RAM, then Russia shouldn’t be able to make weapons with our tech

          I know that’s not how it works but it should be

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        The unjust war CIA and MI6 took great pains and a long time to prepare you mean?

        Sources? Credible or incredible; just not some Telegram channel please. Open www.

        The rest of your comment is just whataboutism, and writing “you people” on social media always says more about the writer’s mental health than about said people. No disrespect.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    It makes sense to use Machine Learning technology (not the Generative crap, the actual pattern recognition stuff) for terminal target recognition.

    The surprise would be if Russia did not use AI in their newest cruise missile design - just because their society is fucked up and their leadership is a socipathic, disconnected autocrat surrounded by yes men that put his own personal pride above the lives of millions of his countrymen, doesn’t mean Russia doesn’t have the people with the technical knowledge to design systems with AI (though certainly far fewer of those than they had before they tried to invade Ukraine, since a ton of the Russians with the highest qualifications left).

    I mean, given them another 50 years or so in their current trajectory, but for now they’re probably still capable of creating their own high-tech solutions in focused applications.

    • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You severely overestimate Russia’s technological capabilities. For the last 30 years all of the money has been moving to politician’s pockets. They are not losing in Ukraine because of a fluke, they are losing because they are a hollowed out shell of what they used to be.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        For many years when I lived in Britain I had a good friend and for a while work colleague who came from Russia. At least when he studied there (so, 30 years ago) their educational system at least for Science and Mathematics was no worse than those in Europe. In fact it’s one of the few good things the so-called “Communist” countries tend to do - they invest heavilly in Education.

        Beyond that, there are two different things:

        • One is a country’s capabilities to have sizable industries operating at a certain technological level.
        • The other one is finding a handful of specialists for very specific design projects in highly controlled environments where making a profit is no concern.

        Whilst it makes sense that Russia has trouble in the first case of actually doing high tech as a business, in size and profitably, because they at least did have a very good educational systems in Science and Mathmatics it also makes sense that they do have people with the know-how there which they could gather for specific high tech design projects were “money is not a problem” since they did train techies as good as the rest of Europe and it was not that long ago so those people are still alive.

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Honestly?

      Isn’t diffusion the process of training AI to fill in missing detail and denoisong? Based on probability? So why not train it against chaff and smoke and jamming?

      Generative AI couldn’t be functionally worse than trying to use birds pecking as a guidance system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pigeon

      Morally bankrupt though

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      not the Generative crap, the actual pattern recognition stuff

      The generative crap requires pattern recognition stuff to work at all.
      But I know what you mean. I am just being pedantic.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “Vhen rockets go up, who cares vhere zey come down? Zat’s not my department!”

    Sarcasm aside, you can buy these in dev kits on MicroCenter:

    https://www.microcenter.com/product/691058/nvidia-jetson-orin-nano-super-developer-kit

    Which means the components are pretty widely available. I’m not sure how you’d prevent someone from ordering a bunch to an in-between country and then shipping them on to Russia after.