• Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m simply not seeing the benefit over a well maintained degoogled Android ROM such as Graphene or /e/OS. The amount of work I have to out in to relearn stuff is next to none, support is higher and you know hardware support lasts long (thinking of e.g. the Murena Fairphone 6). Sailfish looks like just another corporation with partially closed Source and bumpy track record, and with hardware such as Fairphone (and many other phones) you at least got some digital mobility to move to something else if your distribution of choice goes down the drain.

    I get that having a third option is always better even if all three are questionable, but I don’t see that in Sailfish either.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      For me graphene and the like only enshrine the dominance of the two OSs, especially while governments seem all too happy to make laws that do the same.

      We need more options to make sure all the functions of our digital lives are not beholden to two corporations. And make no mistake, Android despite being “open” is beholden to Google.

      That’s my angle anyhow. Sure, it’s not fully open source but it will enforce actual openness more than using offshoots of the main two. Jmho.