• lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      No need, you can just use an IR spotlight to blind the camera. Unlike the military you’re not trying to hide the vehicle.

      But either way you’re actively trying to avoid being picked up by speed cameras so you get a fine.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not really. We don’t have materials that absorb or reflect infrared light. It’s one of the reasons it’s hard to beat inferred-guided (heat seeking) missiles, the only real solution is to drop something hotter than your plane, aka a flare.

      So… get ready for a new era of commercial automotive flares I guess?

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        You are mixing different types of IR and on top are wrong for both cases too. We have materials for both NIR and thermal IR that absorb or reflect them.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’ve been wrong before, this wouldn’t be the first time. But what part of it was wrong? Genuinely, can you clear it up?

          As far as absorbing IR light, I’m not even sure how that would work, wouldn’t it just be emitted again as heat?

          • Eheran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            So if we focus on thermal IR: shiny metal surfaces hardly emit or absorb it. A black surface emits and absorbs as much as possible. We quantify this via the emissivity (and also reflectivity, shiny metal is a mirror). Emissivity of 1 = theoretical maximum of a prefect absorber/emitter (both are directly linked), everyday stuff like skin or wood is about 0.95, shiny metal surfaces roughly 0.1, a rusty or painted surface again about 0.95.

            You only emit and absorb the same in thermal equilibrium. If the surface is hotter, it emits more. If it is colder, it absorbs more.

            • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              So with that last part, I get that in theory, but practically, you can only really absorb IR temporarily, right? Because it all gets released again as heat eventually. Like, say you have a mostly inert object, that isn’t creating any meaningful amount of heat. If you hit that object with 10 joules of thermal IR, over time, wouldn’t nearly all of that energy be either reflected or emitted off it as IR radiation?

              • Eheran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                That is how heat works in general, but that has nothing directly to do with reflecting or absorbing IR.

                • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  I guess it depends on the context, initially I was making comparisons to heat seeking missiles. In that context, one might use the radar absorbent materials to defeat radar guided missiles, but that trick just doesn’t work with heat, as you can’t “permanently” absorb heat the way you can other kinds of energy. If your vehicle is also generating heat, hiding that is quite difficult.