• grumpy_cat@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    China won the game. Their models are cheap and available and free weights.

    Openai will never make any money. They realized it’s a high time to sell so. Wouldnt give a dime

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re also behind Anthropic when it comes to expensive frontier models.

      I wouldn’t buy their stock even if I was looking to invest in AI.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Their reputation is also a bit in the toilet, because people hear “AI” and think of ChatGPT.

        So “man hospitalised after AI suggested he put glue on pizza for tackiness” would have people think he was using it, when he might well have been using a different LLM.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Distillation isn’t stealing the original model, though. It just uses the models to make synthetic training data to train their own thing. They aren’t stealing the model itself.

        Plus, a lot of companies do it. Anthropic’s Claude was calling itself DeepSeek for a while.

        It also doesn’t seem like as big a deal as Anthropic and Open AI make it look, IMO. Them treating it like a national security issue where the company gets its models stolen from under its nose just comes across like a media company claiming that every download is a copy they would otherwise have sold at full price, and thus they have accrued trillions of dollars in damages.

        I could, in theory, take a bunch of google Gemini outputs, and train a GPT-2 model on them. That doesn’t mean that I’ve recreated Gemini, nor does it mean that i’ve stolen it from Google, either.

        To top it all off, it’s not like their services were abused. The companies were presumably paid appropriately for the usage.

        • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t understand how anyone can keep a straight face when they hear an AI company crying about another AI company “stealing” from them while they go before lawmakers and argue that if they weren’t allowed to steal stuff, AI wouldn’t exist… I immediately picture the Always Sunny meme “oh, did someone get addicted to crack” Crying motions.