Most people join the US military to get socialist benefits, calling random soldiers who have likely contributed nothing to the attacks in Iran and we’re likely in the military before Trump declared war and are bound by law to stay in, thugs is a stupid take. Are there terrible people in the US military sure, but I’d argue that most of them are decent people trying to eek out a basic life and would prefer not to kill or be killed in combat.
Stop with the clean wheremacht nonsense. Stormtroopers getting mulched is good.
Most people join the US military to get socialist benefits
Most thugs join gangs to get benefits too. And most thugs would draw the line at bombing a school.
US military was an evil bunch of hooligans long before Trump. I have no repect for anyone who chooses to join there.
No fuck them and fuck you. Iwould rather starve than assist in an illegal war. They are not thugs they are terrorists
FYI OP, your post to [email protected] was reported by four people so far for changing the article’s title. Their mods will almost definitely delete it. Please save yourself & us the hassle by following the rules of the communities you post to.
Good mod. ❤️
Good mod but God damn great title lol.
I wholly agree.
Thanks Maeve ❤️
Didn’t do anything but share the wavelength. I’m glad we do. ❤️
I fall in love with you more and more every day ❤️ i know it’s unrequited
Lol. Have you seen my dark side?! A few dark archetypes definitely reside within, and I’m okay with that, just learning to manage them, right? You’re alright. I’m alright. Everyone is alright. We are where we are, just have to prod ourselves to grow when we get weary. And rest when we’re doing to much. Be well, comrade.
More idiots dying for pedos
missing in action
Well pieces of him are
Rest in piss
More like misting in fractions
defended against
AJ is disgusting.
How so? AJ is just quoting CENTCOM here.
It doesn’t have to copy the exact wording centcom use
Agreed, but I also don’t think that it’s wrong to directly quote someone. It doesn’t necessarily reflect the author’s opinion on the matter or make them “disgusting”.
Jordan is not attacking Iran, Jordan is the defender between those two nations.
That’s not centcom
That’s a quote from another commenter in this thread, not from the AJ article. So how is this relevant?
I’m wondering if comments are out of order for me? They seem not to have been properly federating over the weekend, possibly since Thursday.
killed in Jordan yesterday as “partner forces defended against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks"
Jordan is not attacking Iran, Jordan is the defender between those two nations. Furthermore, even an aggressor can defend against enemy attacks. That is simple English. Very odd you find it ‘disgusting’ to accurately describe defenders as defenders.
The bases are used to attack iran. Jordan is the agressor and no the agressor has no right to defend itself in an illegal war
Jordan is attacking Iran by collaborating with and enabling US-Israeli attacks on Iran. You don’t get to claim you are not involved if you are in fact involved. Providing bases and airspace and missile/drone defense to the aggressor is an act of aggression.
Iran is attacking American soil. End of story.
Jordan is hosting American bases, which are being used to attack Iran. Jordan has only to deny its territory and airspace to Amerikan and Israeli terrorists.
Also, Iran is not attacking Jordan. Iran is attacking American bases in Jordan.
Iran is defending the Jordanien people from Israel, to which the army is capitulating, unlike Hisbollah. Very disingenuous Zionist framing, there.
