• postman@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I know the answer is in the article but tye headline doesn’t make clear if Netflix sued or are being sued. My 2 cents.

      • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        “Netflix [had] sued” is as reasonable as “Netflix [was] sued,” is it not?

        Edit: love it when you make a reasonable point and wind up with zero replies but exactly one downvote. Such a funny little experience, these moments are.

        • Nelots@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Had/was kinda implied this is a thing that happened a while ago. They could probably do something like “Netflix suing for…” and “Netflix being sued for…”, but the confusion is probably intentional for clicks.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nice catch. I read it as “was sued” vs “has sued” without noticing. I should read more carefully.