Artificial intelligence labs are in a new arms race to buy up millions of rare books, slicing them open, scanning the pages and pulping the remains — sparking concerns that the last remaining copies of out-of-print texts are being destroyed on an industrial scale.

ISBNdb notes that “print books from the pre-LLM era are structurally guaranteed to be free of this contamination”.

“Millions of the most valuable books have never been digitised. They exist only in physical form, scattered across library shelves, used bookstores, and out-of-print catalogues. We get them to you at scale.”

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, they sit on shelves because the average person - at least in the U.S. - is steps away from brain death.

    If more people were better educated and or literate this would not be happening.

    • Slovene85@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, they sit on shelves because the average person - at least in the U.S. - is steps away from brain death.

      🤣

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Buddy, how many books do you think are written every year?

      If you started today. And did nothing but read until you died. You would not even have finished all the new books that were published last year.

      Point being. There’s an enourmous amount of books printed every year. Most of them doesnt sell very well. So they are sent back to the publisher. And the publisher does not have room to keep every copy. So they’re destroyed. Maybe recycled into other paper products, maybe burned for energy. Regardless. What AI companies are buying is but a drop in the ocean.

      And it has nothing to do with people “not reading”

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It has everything to do with not reading you muppet, any literate person understands that you don’t need to destroy a book in order to gain the information from it. A child could understand that there’s no reason to destroy the books other than laziness or malice.

        My god, tech people need to be beaten regularly.

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          To scan every page manually is going to take hours. Where as if you remove the spine and separate the pages, you can feed it automatically in minutes.

          And since they want to process hundreds of thousands of books… well, you’re literate so in sure you can do the math.

          They’re just books… And again. For the fifth time probably, publishers destroy more unsold books than these companies. And have been doing so for the past 50 years.

          No one seems to care publishers destroy old unsold books. But as soon as it’s AI companies then all of a sudden it’s a crime against humanity.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Publishers aren’t going out to old bookstores to buy up their old books to destroy.

            Every argument you’ve made is halfbaked at best, tell me - what’s the longest time something can be stored in a computers memory?

            Now what’s the longest time a book can stay intact?

            Yeah, you know the answer - shut the fuck up now.

            • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              No, publishers don’t go to the stores. The stores send the books back to the publisher.

              What are my arguments? Can you even tell me?

              Because what I’ve said. Is that we already do destroys millions of unsold books. And the various filings, rapports, inquiries, and fucking weather data, isn’t sold at bookstores to begin with. So the risk of those being bought and destroyed are zero.

              So… you have not cared one bit, that publishers destroy unsold books for well over 50 years. But when these companies do it, it’s somehow terrible.