Bottom left is Awesome WM. Ask me anything or tell us your picks!

(and feel free to tear me apart on my picks)

    • Pika@hikki.team
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      For me, it’s “use it the dev way or no way at all” mentality baked in.

      If you like the GNOME way of doing things, you’ll feel great. If you don’t like any aspect of it, it will be very hard to rectify.

      Interesting that you had similar experience with KDE, because mine is on the contrary. Whatever I could envision, it could be made with KDE - even the stock one. Essentially, you can even recreate much of GNOME experience within it, if you so prefer.

    • Mistiygirl@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      idk… it just feels very locked down, and honestly every time i’ve tried it, there’s been some issue with it. I feel like it’s not customizable enough for me, and also the themeing is inconsistent.

      • Mistiygirl@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That’s not really my issue. I actually prefer MacOS like-interfaces, although in the grand scheme of things I don’t actually care. I mostly just want to be able to choose what I want though.

        • djdarren@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          People talk about how gnome is the obvious choice for people coming from a Mac, but, well, I came from a Mac and I hated gnome. It wasn’t Mac-like at all, it just felt oddly locked-down, with loads of wasted space. The suggestion that Mac users would like it tells me that those people have never actually used a Mac.

          Meanwhile, I can quite easily make Plasma look like macOS if I wanted to.