• phughes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just because a stock has lost 70% of its value doesn’t mean it can’t lose 70% more.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        While I detest Elon, the company definitely has some value. They’re still the global launch leader at this time. That said, their valuation based on promises of AI and asteroid mining is complete nonsense.

          • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Rocket launch, Twitter and xAI is roughly a zero valuation.

            Starlink the worlds fastest growing ISP, while having an enormous profit margin is the bread and butter. From a serious perspective, also what you should aim the valuation for.

            Did their IPO launch at a fair valuation? Hell nah

            • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Starlink the worlds fastest growing ISP, while having an enormous profit margin is the bread and butter.

              Starlink has only had one profitable year ($70m total), and that’s only if you exclude the cost of rocket launches and only count selling end user hardware and subscriptions.

              • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Literally almost the entire infrastructure of Starlink has to be “rebuilt” every 8 -10 years, because that’s how long their latest generation (v3) satellites last in average before they deorbit due to the air drag at low orbit or their electronics fail due to the higher radiation in Earth’s orbit

                Their business model hasn’t even been proven to be profitable outside niche markets where they’re the only solution for Internet and there are enough people/companies who can afford and are willing to pay a big enough premium for that service that it offsets Starlink’s costs of having to manufacture and launching replacement for their satellites, all of which invariably die after about 10 years.

              • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                The whole scheme is a shitshow of one company propping up another with fake revenues and profits.

                Or

                If people are stupid enough to invest without understanding valuation, then they deserve poverty.