• Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That Probable Cause standard requires a reasonable and articulable suspicion of wrong doing to exist too. Merely crossing a boarder alone doesn’t give rise to that.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You guys are looking at the wrong thing. Airports have their own set of bullshit rules. According to the government choosing to fly automatically implies consent to be searched. Domestic flights have more protections, but international flights basically wave your right to privacy under the 4th.

      They only require explicit consent or probable cause if they want to do an advanced or forensic search of your phone. You can deny the search if you’re a citizen, but if you choose that option they can take your phone into custody for several weeks to attempt to crack it if they choose to do so.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        We’re also talking about the 100 mile border zone though, not just airports. As you say, airports have different rules that allow searches.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They can’t deny a US citizen entry to the US.

        I doubt it would be grounds for turning away a legal visitor, though you would have to have a way to challenge it.