• pasdechance@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Hpw do you run ads for child abuse?

    Instagram has been profiting off paid adverts that promote CSAM in India

    OK…

    How did we get here?

    Earlier this year, Meta announced it was trying to reduce its reliance on third party human moderators by — you guessed it — switching to AI.

    That’s what they said would happen…

    How bad is it?

    The videos promote child abuse and invite you to join a Telegram group to have access to it. So, that’s bad, and also sounds like a honeypot.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I want to be clear I’m not promoting Meta’s decision here by any stretch.

      There is an interesting problem with human moderators though. Once the entire population of Earth is posting on social media, are there enough humans to ever moderate it? You might say oh sure, because the average person might only post occasionally and human moderators could be dedicated full time so they’d outweigh users by factors. But that kind of ignores influencers who also generate content full time.

      I really don’t see how there will ever be enough humans to do this right. Or if there are, they will have to number in the hundreds of millions to keep up. The bit about all humans posting is not really hyperbolic at all. Zuckerberg already has 1 billion of us.

      • leriotdelac@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m sure it’s still possible for humans to moderate paid adds content, its a small part of the overall traffic volume.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Fair enough. But I think we’d be just as upset to see pedos organizing in unpaid content.